[Wolverine]

okay lol i kinda stole this idea from another site...but i dont think it matters XD


whats this about??:

okay so this is what's gonna happen..... the next person to post in this topic...will rate my sig/s. and then person after that will rate the person who rated my sig and so on.

so basically....YOU ARE RATING THE SIG OF THE POSTER ABOVE YOU lol

next person rates my sigs...

if you are going to comment...still rate the sig of the poster above you :twisted: XD


**just thought this would be nice..you know, for the people that are just looking for a quick response. I can see this becoming popular soon :D

[MadBacker]

Yours won't show for me :?

[saviourking120]

Y'know, it would be nice if this topic was stickied, since this is a recurring game on this site.

Anyways:
1-7/10: Way too dark. The texture is cool
2-8/10: Nice concept, but looks a little plain.

[Terroth]

Yea that would be a good idea.
Anyway, 9.5 /10 i just dislike the lighting.
Second one, well i wont rate it because it changes so yea no point.

[inspectra]

1-8/10, its excellent but the colours of Samus just throw me off a bit.
2-9/10, very, very good, great colours and everything, very eye-catching. :)

[Wolverine]

a sticky?? sweet, but i can't make topics sticky's so an admin would have to :D

anyway..

never have been a huge fan of sprites but i do like this one, 8/10

[areneeb123]

Yeah, saviour, how do you make yours change like that? At first I though you were just on all the time and changing it frequently. :P

Yours, maybe 8/10, I like the links to your tuts and the metal sig is cool.

[frank34443]

7.5/10 for the first one.

Both of these are solid sigs with nice effects which I would rate a low to solid moderate. You have a way of making somewhat chatoic effects look pretty good, so that works to your advantage. Nice work :)

Edit: I agree that stickying this post would be a nice idea. Anyone care to do the honors?

[areneeb123]

9/10 on the first one, I like that sig.
6/10 on that usercard, I don't like it much.

[MadBacker]

I like the style of the first one a lot. Also the colors are nice IMO. 8/10

The second has great flow and effects. 8.5/10

[Digital Image]

First Signature: Interesting style, but I think its to dark, and there aren't enough effects. 6.7/10

Second Signature: I like it, only (again) I think its to dark. And their may be room for more effects. 8/10

[Acks]

First: Bit bland. Feels like it's missing something. Render is oversharpened.
Second: Colourful, brash, stands out. The render isn't blended in though.

[Mrshinyredplanet]

Heh. It made me laugh. Nice and colorful. Text could use work.

[Wolverine]

be sure to rate the sigs!!

nice :D 8/10

try using some different effects 7/10

[saviourking120]

#1: 8/10: It's cool for a nametag
#2: 9/10. Try adding in some grainy texture for more realism.

@Areenb: Sign up at the link below.

http://www.azupload....afecd9cd5ba2f3a

[Ben9190]

saviourking120 said:

#1: 8/10: It's cool for a nametag
#2: 9/10. Try adding in some grainy texture for more realism.

@Areenb: Sign up at the link below.

http://www.azupload....afecd9cd5ba2f3a

thanks i have been wondering how to do that :P

as for the sig 9.6/10

[Exellioth]

this is a cool idea for a thread :) anyway
1- 9.2/10
2-8.8/10
nice sigs ! :D

[MadBacker]

I don't like pop-outs, and the render looks blurry. It has some flow. Text never goes in a corner! 4/10
The background is good, but the render is too small and it ruins flow. Text is alright. 6/10

[Cyrilshark]

1. I hate how it's so... shallow, cloudy... soo... not colorful enough. Sorry, but 3.5/10

2. A lot better, IMO. Still has that "grey" look, but it has a little more depth and I like the style of blending. 6/10 for this one.

[inspectra]

1-5/10 Dont like verts, but also render looks oversharpened and a bit grainy.
2-7/10 Good flow, but the c4d on the right ruins the flow. Text should rarely be rotated.